To start off with yes I'm a film reviewer myself & on the off chance yes I've had to put a film down on curtain thing's that completely ruin a film enjoyment but over the past 15 years, all I've seen is one bad review after another with no good points just all 100% negative which puts a very big Negative impact on Hollywood film makers & the reason why they don't bother any more to make any effort.
Yes you have to be honest about a film but there is a little thing call being unbiased when reviewing a film regardless of who's starring in the film or who made the film. Because when does being honest become something negative just because of who made the film or who staring in it.
Reviews are meant to be judge on:
1. how the story-line is, was the concept of the story written well or come off the way it meant to come off on screen?
2. Do the actors play off each making the film more believable & the characters believable?,
3. Are the special effect up to scratch without any bad looking C.G.I or green screen effects?
4. Did the the screen writers write the character right for the actors strength as an actor/actress who play them?,
5. Is the acting good from the actor/actress playing the character?
6. is the casting for the story & film good casting?
These are the things that a film should be judged on & not buy who is playing in the film or who has made the film.
Too example Michael bay everyone is hating on transformers because of what he did with Megan fox firing her after the second film which lets face it was her own fault as of what she said in an interview was the a dumb thing to say in Hollywood saying i quote:
"working with Michael bay is like working for Hitler"
Now Steven Spielberg saw this quote in the magazine it was him that told Michael bay to fire her, not the other way around.
The other film that just came out that flop because of the box office reviews Jupiter ascending now all ive seen is negative reviews on the film because it from the Wachowski bother who brought us the matrix, now this is a clear example of hating on a film just because of who made it.
Box office is blaming Rotten tomato film review website that everyone seem to love there review which would account why people love negative b*llsh*t all the time with its 100% all negative reviews. To be honest i cant blame them there for that because this is no offence to everyone people are like sheep, they will blindly follow the person in front of them & believe everything that is put in-front of them hence the reason why all the negative reviews in rotten tomato have put people off watching the film.
Now i personally watched Jupiter ascending myself i think all the negative reviews its got is pretty unfair, as the film has its good points as well far from any point dose it mean the film was a complete right off accord to this negative reviews its got.
People have there opinions on things but they have to realise that these film makers are reading these reviews & seeing that every review it nothing but 100% negative all the time instead of 50/50 good & bad review their thinking well screw you ,why should we spend are time in paying out £127 - $258 million & the stars taking their time out of their own lives which is 3 - 5 years depending on whats being made on making a film perfect when all your going to do is be negative all the time about the film they are making this isn't an opinion this is fact, because i grantee you that's what they are thinking when all they see is one negative review after another.
What makes me laugh even more is the fact people think sharknado is a fantastic film yet they said Jupiter ascending & transformers are bad film's.......... think about that for a second if it can sink in.
A film should only be considered a failure or a flop if the whole film is a total failure meaning:
1. Script writer not playing to actors / actress strengths.
2. poor Special effect that makes the film unbelievable
3. Poor acting from actors / actress , making the concept of character unbelievable on screen
4. poor story write (I.E) the concept of the film itself is lazy & bad
5. pacing, (I.E) extremely slow to the point it lose the audience
6. bad casting for actors that don't suit the character.
These are the things that a film should be consider a flop or failure not its box office takings, because it very rare a film make box office on realise because of all the negative reviews that put people off watching the film at the cinema, reason why the film make more money on DVD sales or rental sales.
Despite what opinion people have or what they think, being 100% negative on a film impact the movie industries, its why they aren't bothering to make good movie anymore, its the reason why we get more mediocre movies every-time because of the negative reviews i cant blame them for it. Because us the views come across ungrateful to them because all we do is writing nothing but negative reviews.
So in a way you only have yourselves to blame really so there isn't any point blaming Hollywood because their fed up so they don't put effort in any more hence the reason for the remakes & reboots.
Which brings me to my point Why should Hollywood make something different when all everyone dose is pull the film down with negative reviews. This is why they are just reboot / remake old film's, you may agree or disagree with me on this but this is reality because if i was them its how i would be thinking.
No comments:
Post a Comment