Death's & accidents in Hollywood Horrifying Movie Set Accidents

 

Tin Man's Collapsed Lung

 

After landing the role of the Tin Man in the 1939 film 'The Wizard of Oz,' actor Buddy Ebsen quickly discovered that he was allergic to the makeup used for his costume, and after inhaling the substance for ten days of shooting, he ended up in the hospital with a collapsed lung. He suffered from breathing issues for the rest of his life, and Jack Haley took over the role believing that his predecessor had simply been fired.

 

 

Paralyzed Stunt Double

 

During production of the film 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,' David Holmes (stunt double for Daniel Radcliffe, who played the title character) was left paralyzed after suffering a fall which seriously injured his spine.

 

Stabbed by Van Damme

While filming a fight scene for the 1989 film 'Cyborg,' Jean-Claude Van Damme accidentally stabbed his costar Jackson "Rock" Pinckney in the eye. The injury caused him to permanently lose vision in that eye, and thus Pinckney went on to sue Van Damme and was awarded $487,500 in damages.

 

The Risk of Playing Jesus

Actor Jim Caviezel acquired multiple injuries when he played Jesus in the film 'The Passion of the Christ.' His back was gashed during a whipping scene, he suffered from hypothermia, and he separated his shoulder while carrying a giant cross. Most notably, though, the actor was struck by lightning on the set.

 

 

Vin Diesel's Stunt Double

 Harry L. O'Connor, who stood in as Vin Diesel's stunt double for the 2002 film 'xXx,' was killed while filming a scene. He was originally supposed to land on a submarine during his stunt, but instead crashed into a bridge and died on impact.

 

 

 

George Clooney Contemplated Suicide

According to George Clooney, he contemplated suicide after being involved in a major accident while working on the film 'Syriana.' He broke his spine during a stunt gone awry, and the extreme pain almost proved far too much for the actor

 

 

 

Crushed By Debris

While working on the 2008 film 'Jumper,' a set dresser named David Ritchie was killed when he was crushed under frozen debris during the dismantling of a set.

 

 

Channing Tatum Gets Scalded

Channing Tatum is no stranger to terrible film accidents. While filming a scene in a freezing river for the movie 'The Eagle,' a crew member accidentally poured boiling hot water on Tatum, which burned the skin off of the tip of his penis.

 

Accidentally Shot

On the set of 'The Crow' in 1993, Bruce Lee's son Brandon Lee was accidentally shot to death. The scene called for Lee to be shot with a gun that was loaded with blanks, but a real bullet was accidentally left in the gun when a dummy round was removed.

 

 

Gone in 60 Seconds 2

The film 'Gone in 60 Seconds' almost had a sequel, but the second movie was scrapped after the untimely death of its actor/director, H.B. Halicki. A water tower he had set to topple accidentally fell too soon and hit a light pole, which struck Halicki directly on the head. He was killed instantly.

 

Record for Most On-Set Deaths

The largest number of film set deaths in the history of film happened while filming the made-for-TV movie 'The Sword of Tipu Sultan' in 1989. When the film studio caught on fire, 62 crew members and extras were trapped inside and ultimately killed.
The film's director/lead actor Sanjay Khan had to undergo 72 surgeries during his 13-month stay in the hospital after suffering serious burns during the incident.

                                    The Last Lion Takes a Life

 On the set of the 1972 South African film 'The Last Lion,' a sound technician named James Chapman was killed when he got mauled by a lion.

 

Hazard of the Trade

Long-time stuntman Victor Magnotta died while filming the 1987 Michael Keaton film 'The Squeeze.' Magnotta drowned when he was trapped inside a car that he drove off of a pier and into the Hudson River.

 

Losing an Eye

While filming the 1986 film 'Maximum Overdrive,' a radio-controlled lawnmower ran over a block of wood and shot wood splinters at Director of Photography Armando Nannuzzi, who lost an eye as a result of the incident. He went on to sue Stephen King for $18 million in damages.

 

The Twilight Zone Disaster

 Lastly, one of the most infamous on-set accidents happened during filming of 'The Twilight Zone: The Movie' in 1982. Actor Vic Morrow, along with 7-year-old Mynca Dinh Le and 6-year-old Renee Shin-Yi Chen, were killed when a helicopter got caught in pyrotechnics and crashed. Morrow and Le were both decapitated by the helicopter's tail rotor, and Chen was crushed to death.

The difference between horror genre's & why you probaley dont find horror's scary

What's the Difference between Psychological horror & gore horror ?

well this is a proven fact that psychological horror film's are the most frightening horror film in the horror genre, like one miss call, shutter island, when a stranger calls etc are all design to get into your mind & your darkest fears & scare the living hell of you.

Gore horror like Hellraiser , The hill's have eye's, wrong turn, etc are design to shock not scare you with some being cut open or someone being torn apart where there is alot blood every where....

Now a lot of people say they haven't seen a horror film to truly scare them or shock them, ya there are a few horror films that aren't believable it does help to scare when a horror concept could happen to you & is believeable, but 9 out of 10 people this is a fact that some people don't relax watching a film their iver doing something while watching the film or talking this is why your not going to find a film shocking or scary because your mind is occupied on something esle.

Now if you relaxed & let yourself be drawn in to the film's concept/storyline special with a psychological horror it will in fact scare the live crap out of you why because your mind is fixed on one thing the story & the dark concept of the film itself.
what you don't notice is because you are relax watch that horror your mind is kicking in the fear motor in your brain which is why we jump or get cold chills down the spine when you see something that is seriously frightening. But this is the difference between the two horror genre & the reason why you probably don't find thing scary

 

The reason why man of steel wasnt ruined & was a brilliantly made film & why hater's are wrong

I'm writing because all I've seen is hater's pull this film down & complain about a film they haven't even seen or refuse to watch because it wasn't film the way they wanted it. Well boo hoo, we can't have everything in life our way all the time its called life.
All I've heard it wasn't inspirational or emotional it sucks or it was the worst film ever. SERIOUSLY!!!!!!!! I will give you several reason why this superman was the best superman film & why this film worked as a whole to put the record straight from all the people complaining.

Concept behind man of steel
 people say that the city was destroy & a lot of people got killed & that is one of the reason why it was over the top.....really think about that, you have two super power being fighting each other one hell bent on destruction & other trying his best to save the people there will be collateral damage no matter how you look at it.
You cant just throw a person like superman through a build & the wall still be standing that is completely stupid in even thinking it would be standing in a cartoon you can get away with that in a live action film no. The other thing as well which people are complaining about is the mass of people that died, if you think about it & look at the character of Zod his nature, he was hell bent on destroying earth & recreating new krypton on earth meaning he would of destroyed the city's anyway but I guess people complaining don't see that because there to busy whining, which was clear portrayed in this scene with the skull's which was a very powerful imagine of destruction that Zod would unleash.

 Zack Snyder filmed it this way for a reason & this is what he said :

" I wanted the movie to have a mythological feeling. In ancient mythology, mass deaths are used to symbolize disasters. In other countries like Greece and Japan, myths were recounted through the generations, partly to answer unanswerable questions about death and violence. In America, we don’t have that legacy of ancient mythology. Superman (who first appeared in ‘Action Comics’ in 1938) is probably the closest we get. It’s a way of recounting the myth"

This I agree with because America's don't really understand ancient mythology like the rest of the world dose because most of Europe is steeped in ancient mythology history most of it has been in disasters or destruction. This Ancient mythology brings me to a point as to why you see the krypton's looking medieval in their armour & their culture as being medieval in there council.

The emotional side of the film
 People say there was no emotional contain in this film....again seriously!!!!!!! Let me direct you to the begin of the film the scene with Jor'l & Lara giving birth to kal'el, that one scene with the way the music was is one of the several emotional moment in this film.
Look at it from their point of view as loving parents given birth to the first human child in there culture but their planet is about to blow up & their having to sending there son 50 million light years across space to save his life to a world that will never fully accept him for who is because to us it would be alien.

This is where Lara says quote "he'll be an out cast they will kill him"
but you hear jor'l say "how??? he will be a god to them"

these words alone have power behind them which Russell Crowe & Ayelet Zurer performed brilliant & showed real emotion as parents to bring a believable moment. 
Not only that they will ever see their son grow up to be the hero he is to become or get to hold him again that is enough pain for any parents to go through in there last hours that is the powerful emotions behind that scene it the way Zack Snyder was putting across.

 The other scene in this film Clark as a young teenage when he save the kids in the bus, the one scene with him talking to his earth father with him say "you have to keep that side of you secret"
Clark saying "what was I supposed to do let them die" 
Jonathan Kent saying "maybe"
It was that one scene he told him the truth of that he wasn't from earth & that he wasn't from any galaxy near him & that he had powers beyond any one could possibly have, it that moment when Clark said "can I just carry on being you son" Jonathan saying "you will always be my son" is one of those scenes that breaks your heart because you can feel the pain & conflict in Clark's heart knowing that he's not human.

 

The other scene with the tornado people saying the scene doesn't make sense, Clark has super powers he could of easily saved his father, well this is what this scene is portraying.

 

One of the most defining moments in cinema history are when you get a powerful tragic scene in the movie & this scene was one of the greatest. This scene from man of steel was the defining moment of the film when Clark is faced with saving ...his father & revealing his identity but his father say no.
It that moment that show why Henry Cavil & Kevin Costner was the brilliant choice to be casted for these role.
Henry as Clark/superman seriously showed real emotion in that scene having to see someone he cares about tell him to let him go & sacrifice himself to hide his identity, with that last smile & a slight nod of the head from Jonathan Kent he was saying that he was proud to be his father because he raise a hero but also gave him a message that not everyone can be saved, that showed brilliantly from Kevin Costner on the screen.

That is one of the most powerful messages in man of steel, Gives the message just because you have the power to save people doesn't mean you can save everyone because its impossible.

 

 

 

Background story as to why the planet blow up explain by the computer imagine of jor'l.

 

Now this was brilliant told has they have never really explain why the planet was destroyed in the first place it was only told as the sun exploded for no reason.

Now in man of steel what was brilliant about this one scene is the fact it went in to detail on how & why the planet was destroyed. Which also showed what type of culture they are as a people & in there own superior arrogance they cause there own undoing which bring a better storyline to a film & give the bases of the story to why kal'el was sent to earth.

 

 Soldier scene.
Now this scene was brilliant in the film because Colonel Nathan Hardy played brilliantly by Christopher Meloni  really show that not all hero's have super power's, which represents our military force in the right way in the film which was amazingly done. Because a soldier will lay down his life in order to save the world this scene perfectly represented that, Zack Snyder putting that across in this film it was nothing short of brilliance's to represent that.

Micheal Shannon as Zod.
Now you serious couldn't get a better actor to play Zod, Micheal brought a convincing ruthless cold character to Zod that what makes Micheal Shannon brilliant as an actor & the best choice by far.
It the way he hold himself as the character that give him this edge specially with the way he say "do you think you son is safe" then shouts "I will find him!!!!"  you could seriously feel the conviction behind those word's which made this scene brilliant & convincing nature of Zod.

Henry Cavil as superman.
Now I swear most people are complaining about the film because its not American playing the role & its someone British.
 Well I have one thing really to say to this, British actor's don't over act like some American actors do, the reason why Henry fit this role perfect is because of the man him self. Henry didn't have a ticket to get in to Hollywood film's just like that it was an uphill struggle, with money problem having to travel back & forth trying to get auditions.
He was given advise from Russell him self years ago when he was trying to make it big in Hollywood trying to get a role, Russel advise was "every mile takes a thousand steps" that stuck with him, so when Henry did make it big he was humbled by the fact its wasn't easy to get into the business & the struggle side of things.
But having a military family background as well is why Henry was the prefect choice for superman, he brought the character of superman the right way & really showed a humble nature on screen which was a brilliant performance which gave us a believable superman character that is like the comic books.
The fact that some people say they couldn't relate to the character of superman in this film well you mite want to look at yourselves if that's the case because to relate to a character like superman you have to be pure of heart, Loyal, trustworthy, humble, loving, caring & above all respectful of other to truly relate to a character of superman. If you haven't got those quality sorry to say but you will never relate to the character of superman, that is truth & fact from a pyshcology respective.

Amy Adams as Lois lane

Ive seen a few people say why did they pick Amy Adams to play this role? , why not she is a talented actress & she really did pull this role off & she looks beautiful in this film as Lois lane.
She does bring a real reporter role to this character as you see she spent years trying to find who kal'el is from all the people he's saved.
 Hence the reason why in the film you heard her say these words which set the tone of superman story from the being; " How do you find someone that spent a life time cover his tracks, to some he was a guardian angel, for other a ghost who never quiet fitted in"
That is what make Amy Adam's prefect as Lois lane. A lot of critics said there wasn't any romance with her character but come on this was only the begin of the story of course there is going to be romance because she still a little wary of him because of what he can do.

Superman give up to the government
If you look at it this way superman could easy destroy them in one hit & take over the world easy but that not what superman is about.
He was brought up to see the right from wrong, he was taught that because of his powers he can easy kill someone this is why in curtain scene in this film you can see he took great restraint not to hit that bully as a young kid & with the diner scene not to punch that guy through the wall but instead destroyed his truck which was funny.
these scene showed that superman growing up had been tough to hold he's anger against a human & made a vow never to take a human life. Him giving up to the government showed that he wasn't a threat to them even tho they were still wary of him because of what he can do, which later they realise his not the enemy, showed a brilliant concept in the film its self because this is the way we would be if this happened for real, we would be wary of someone that can easy destroy the planet ,Zack Snyder was brilliant in showing that in the film.

Superman shell not Kill
Now all I've heard from comment is how could they put a scene that superman killed someone that completely ruin's his character as a whole.
Well this is where these people are wrong because superman nature & the way he is wont kill a human life but he will kill an alien life form that threats the earth & people safety.
 There are a few others I believe in the comic book world he killed for the greater good, its the whole concept that Zack Snyder put in this film knowing when to save a life but knowing when to take a life for the greater good.
The scene with Zod was bound to happen because Zod pushed him to kill him, because it was Ive him or the family Zod was going to vaporise. This is why Superman had no choice but to kill zod because even tho you could see the pain of having to kill one of his own people which serious showed emotion in that scene, which Henry done brilliantly, he had no other choice to do it because Zod would of carried on destroy everything kal'el has called home for the past 30 years.

The inspirational side of the film
Some people are saying there is no inspiration in the film, which clearly is not being seen, the inspiration come from the character of superman going through a lot of unanswered question in he life struggling to over come bullying & rejection, the conflict in he's mind, having all these power but seeing what the world would do if they found out he had these powers at a young age.
The inspiration comes from he earth father teaching him to learn the way's to be more human to learn their weakness's & strength's what it is to be human.
also It the one scene in this film that stands out the most for inspiration the fact he when to see the priest when Zod threat the earth they have 24 hours to give him up, that showed a more human side to kal'el that he sort the guidance of someone of the church. It was what the priest tell him that was inspirational, it that guidance that gives him the strength to step out of the shadows into the light & become what the world needs a hero that is the inspirational side in this film that people cant see.

This whole thing about the destruction of the city & people being killed by the city being destroy was need to be in the film for a realistic feel because that's is what will happen because is collateral damage & one other reason, that reason is because it gives way for the batman vs superman storyline.
 Its a reason for batman to investigate superman which conflict between them will happen because they both think there enemy's of earth but as we all know become friends in the end when they realise there not a threat & working on the same side but where the story line will go in the sequel we'll have to wait.
 Even tho I'm not sure about Ben Afleck playing batman because I cant really see him as batman, I'm willing to give it a chance because it could be a good film if they write he storyline right for his character & get a brilliant actor to play lex luthor which personally should be mark strong & not Byan Cranston.
The reason why I believe this is because seeing Byan Cranston play the bad guy in total recal remake he wasn't that great of a villain to be honest he dosen't have the on screen presence as a villain like mark strong dose, this is why I believe Mark Strong should be Lex Luthor for the man of steel sequel.
 I truly hope Zack Synder picks him because if Byan Cranston get pick to do luthor & ben afleck fails as batman, Henry carvil brilliant as he is mite not be enough to save the film because he will be carry the film the whole way through.

these are the reason why this film wasn't ruined like most people say it was or it sucked because if you see it from this point of view your see that this film was brilliantly made & is the best superman film to date. But lets hope this sequel dosen't fail because we need a superman trilogy which it deserves.

Movie new's: How to Make a Better Spawn Movie Can Spawn find more Hollywood success this time?

by Jesse Schedeen IGN

The '90s weren't exactly a great time for fans of superhero movies. Instead of a Superman reboot, we got Shaquille O'Neal as Steel. And just before Blade arrived on the scene to light the first sparks of a Hollywood superhero renaissance, there was Spawn. This supernatural avenger quickly rose to prominence in the early '90s amid a new wave of characters from upstart publisher Image Comics. But despite his success in comics, animation, and toys, Spawn found little success on the big screen.
That hasn't stopped creator Todd McFarlane from pursuing a follow-up film. And at the Toronto Fan Expo earlier this month, he suggested that the long-gestating Spawn reboot may finally be taking shape and could even go into production next year. But is there any reason for excitement given how lousy the first movie was? Actually, yes. There's far more potential with this franchise than that adaptation would have you believe. And we have a few ideas of how this reboot can better take advantage of all the franchise has to offer.

Emphasize the R-Rating

If movies like Kick-Ass and 300 have proved anything, it's that there is a market for superhero movies aimed squarely at adults. Maybe not an Avengers or Dark Knight-level audience, but not every comic book movie is destined for a billion dollar box office total.
One of the flaws that brought down the original Spawn was the decision to trim the final product in order to earn a PG-13 rating. While the R-rated Director's Cut later released on DVD certainly has its flaws, it's clearly superior to the theatrical version. Anyone who has ever read a Spawn comic knows this is not a PG-13-type of franchise, nor is there any benefit to trying to squeeze it into that mold.
One of the reasons the animated series was so much better executed is that it knew its audience. That series appeared on HBO's late-night lineup. It was aimed squarely at adult viewers and didn't shy away from the violence, brutality, and sexuality of Spawn's world. It was more true to the source material, and as many fans will claim, managed to surpass it. That's what McFarlane and his producers need to be looking towards for inspiration.
Now that R-rated comic book movies are more commonplace in Hollywood, there's no excuse for the Spawn reboot not to revel in its adults-only status

 

 

Explore the Legacy

 



Unlike Tigger, the wonderful thing about Spawn is that he's not the only one. Though Al Simmons was the star of the original movie, animated series, and the majority of the comic series, he's ultimately just one player in a long line of Hellspawn that have fought in the battle between Heaven and Hell for thousands of years.
The first movie touched on this aspect of the Spawn mythos when it introduced Cogliostro as an aged mentor to Simmons. The comics have also introduced Medieval Spawn (a knight named Sir John of York), Nyx (a female, Wiccan Hellspawn), Mandarin (a Hellspawn from the Sung Dynasty), and Gunslinger Spawn (pretty self-explanatory), among many others. A character named Jim Downing was even introduced as an ongoing replacement for Simmons in recent years.
While having so many versions of Spawn helps McFarlane Toys keep churning out new action figures year after year, they also contribute to a strong sense of legacy within the franchise. Just as the mantle of the Flash and Green Lantern is passed down in DC Comics, the Spawn identity is one that has been worn by many heroic and troubled figures over the centuries. Why not reflect that legacy in the movie?
The new Spawn could be reminiscent of the Highlander franchise, sprinkling in flashbacks to the Hellspawns of yesteryear and exploring the wider scope of this universe. Depending how successful the reboot is, it could even set the stage for various period-specific spinoffs

 

Don't Rehash the Origin

 

This is a concern with just about any superhero movie, regardless of character. The more superhero properties that make the jump to Hollywood, the less interested we are in origin stories. Origin stories are almost inherently formulaic. A character experiences a personal tragedy, gains new abilities, struggles at learning how to harness them, and overcomes their first great foe in their rise to prominence. Sound familiar?

The fact is that Spawn's origin has already been told on the big screen. And even though the first movie is largely forgotten by casual moviegoers, there doesn't seem to be a great deal to be gained by revisiting that well. The first movie stuck reasonably close to the established origin of the comics. Rehashing that story, even in a more faithful manner, is only going to bore hardcore fans and leave others with the impression that Spawn is a Ghost Rider clone. And if that basic origin story didn't hook casual audiences the first time around, what guarantee is there the reboot would be more successful?
We'd much rather this reboot follow the example of movies like Punisher: War Zone and Incredible Hulk. Neither of those movies was technically a sequel to the ones that preceded them, but nor did they waste time retreading that familiar ground. The Spawn reboot is better off just throwing viewers into the deep end with a lead hero who is already established. Whatever details about his past are necessary to the plot can be revealed along the way. Skipping the origin story allows McFarlane and his collaborators more freedom. They can stick to familiar villains like Violator and Malebolgia, or they can blaze new ground and include characters who didn't make the cut in the original movie or the animated series


 

Downplay Spawn
This may seem a bit counter-intuitive. Why would you reboot the Spawn franchise by shifting focus away from the title character? But one thing that comic books like Gotham Central and the most recent volume of The Punisher have shown is that there's great opportunity to be had in using an iconic character sparingly. Gotham Central focused on the men and woman of the Gotham City Police Department. Batman only sporadically appeared, and even then usually as an ominous, quiet presence. While Frank Castle played a more direct role in Greg Rucka's Punisher series, Rucka purposely removed Castle's trademark narration and framed his stories from other characters' points of view instead.
There's no reason this approach couldn't be adapted for superhero movies as well, and Spawn would make an excellent candidate. Rather than ask viewers to latch onto a former assassin-turned-enforcer for Hell, it might be easier to choose a neutral character with a more "man on the ground" perspective on the conflict between angels, demons, and cybernetic monstrosities. As it happens, the Spawn universe has two such characters - Detectives Sam Burke and Twitch Williams. Sam and Twitch first appeared in the core Spawn series as investigators into Spawn's nightly exploits. Later they spun out into their own series, which saw them run up against the many strange and unusual sights Spawn's New York City has to offer.
We could think of far worse ways to frame the reboot than through the eyes of Sam and Twitch. The truth is that their solo series featured some of the better executed stories of the Spawn franchise. And it seems that, circa 2007, McFarlane was even considering this approach. His plan at the time called for a film where Spawn himself was silent and Twitch was the central protagonist.
It's not clear whether McFarlane is still pursuing this angle with his current screenplay draft. But given his repeated desire to produce the film quickly and on a modest budget, downplaying Spawn may be the only sensible approach to take

Action and Atmosphere
Again, the original Spawn is not a great film, but no element has aged worse than the special effects. The CG effects in the movie are more worthy of Playstation 1-era cutscenes than a blockbuster superhero film. Standards have only skyrocketed since then thanks to the awe-inspiring spectacle of movies like The Avengers and the heavily stylized approach of 300 and Sin City. To succeed, Spawn is going to need to do a better job of competing with its peers this time.
This is hardly an insurmountable challenge, however. As a super-powered crusader, Spawn offers a unique blend of physical strength and both supernatural and projectile weapons. His undead body is powered by necroplasm, which can manifest in all sorts of interesting ways. His suit is alive, allowing for various transformations and fluid attacks akin to Spider-Man's symbiote costume. And he's not averse to blowing away enemies with a giant gun or two. This range of abilities, coupled with the otherworldly foes he frequently battles, could allow for some unique and visually striking action scenes.
The other aspect of Spawn's powers that the reboot would do well to reflect is his limited power source. The comic often displayed a meter that would slowly count down from 9,999 as Simmons unleashed his necroplasmic magic. The mystery of what would happen when the meter ran out added a sense of danger to his adventures and influenced Simmons' continued reliance on firearms and physical attacks.

 

Outside the action sequences, we'd like to see a more defined atmosphere with this reboot. Spawn shouldn't offer a traditional version of New York, but one that reflects the dramatic intersection of the mundane and supernatural worlds. The designers should look to books like Hellspawn for inspiration, where Ben Templesmith and other artists brought a new level of surrealism and style to Spawn's adventures.
The question, of course, is how much McFarlane and his collaborators can accomplish on what looks to be a modest budget. There's no point trying to outdo the sheer spectacle of Marvel and DC's superhero projects. But at the same time, Spawn's world demands a certain level of visual fidelity that his first movie failed to achieve. If the reboot can't do better, there's no point in even moving forward.

I completely agree with all this, because it the only way spawn can move forward.

Movie News: Poltergeist is Getting a Reboot

If you've not ready seen a poltergeist movie its about a family that moved from a city to a quiet neighbourhood or so they fought they did, An ancient grave site wasn't removed & a very powerful evil spirit is awakened in a form of a poltergeist & finds an attraction with a young girl carol Ana because of her aura, she then taken from the world of the living to the underworld where it because a fight against evil for the family to get her back from the beast. Now this film spawned 3 film's, poltergeist, poltergeist 2:the other side, poltergeist 3 with the mirrors.

 

 

From what I've read-ed poltergeist reboot Filming will take place in Toronto, and could begin as early as September, if everything with the casting and script go according to plan.Director Gil Kenan has officially started the casting process for his reboot of Poltergeist. Bear in mind the character's in the reboot are being revamped like the Evil dead film, so we looking a different characters playing the role of the family Carol Ana character is being replaced with a young girl called Madison.Recent script by David Lindsay-Abaire follows a family the Bowen when they relocate to a new town to start over after father, Eric, loses his job. Their life is turned upside-down when their daughter, Madison, is kidnapped by the malevolent forces that appear in their new home.
Along with a different family, the rebooted version will feature other brand-new characters, including Carrigan Burke, a colorful TV personality who hosts Haunted House Cleaners, and his ex-wife, Dr. Brooke Powell, a local parapsychologist and professor and Burke’s ex-wife. Her team investigates the disappearance of Madison and the supernatural events that surround her abduction.

 

Sam Raimi, Robert G. Tapert, and Roy Lee are set to produce the reboot, Ive see Sam raimi do some creepy films like the The Grudge, Boogeyman, The Messengers,The Grudge 2, Drag Me to Hell, The Possession ,Evil Dead reboot so maybe just maybe we could be seeing a more creeper, nasty & darker version of poltergeist, But time will tell on this as it looks like it will be a 2015 or 2016 when we get to see this if filming is starting this September. But what do you think of this being done, do you think that a classic horror film like this needs a reboot or do you think it should be left as it is?.

10 Badass Moments From The New Man Of Steel Trailer

1.Man Of Skulls

Easily the most iconic shot from the latest trailer, the sight of Superman buried in a massive pile of skulls is extremely chilling. Going to go ahead and guess this is the end result of Zod's heat vision.We're picturing a group of humans surrounding Superman to protect him, before suffering the full wrath of the General.

2.Faora's Promise

"You will not win. For every human you save, we will kill a million more." Yeah, we don't particularly like those odds.

 

3.Heat Vision 1

Zod seems to be really enjoying himself here.
But, as a lifelong warrior who has suddenly found his body transformed into a living weapon, we imagine he would be. With power like this in he hands of some as evil as zod would make for a formal enemy  

4.Invasion Forces

This trailer fully reveals Zod's plan - to attack the earth until they give up Kal-El.

Anyone who wants to see how this might play out is advised to pick up Superman: Earth One, by J Michael Straczynski, published in 2010.
It seems Snyder's taking a lot of cues from that book, with Zod's plan, and this shot in particular, seemingly ripped from its pages.

5.Batter Up
Zod might be a recent visitor to the States, but he appears to have picked up their passion for sport fairly quickly.

But what's he hitting? Is it a baseball? Is it a shuttlecock? No, it's Superman. Final we get to see a fight scene in a superman film.

 

6.Super Lois

On first watch, this looked to be a shot of Lois Lane suiting up, just like her best friend Pepper Potts in Iron Man 3.However, a closer investigation reveals that she's only wearing the helmet, not the full battle suit. Is she about to take a trip into space? Actually, probably not - because if there's one thing Superman IV taught us, it's that humans don't need helmets in space. We can actually breathe perfectly normally up there. Who knew?this will be interesting to find out why she wearing this.

7.Super Snyder

absolutely love this shot. It's the moment where Snyder pans around Superman as he bursts out of one of Zod's ships.it look like synder has done some fantastic angles with the film to make it look real.

8.Zod Smash

Remember that bit in The Avengers when Hulk landed on a jump jet and tore its pilot out?
Well, Zod goes one better here, punching what he thinks is a big bird right in what he thinks is its stupid face.

 

9.Heat Vision 2

As one of our staffers said this morning, "Wow, I forgot that Superman did stuff other than punching and flying."Yep, he's got a boat-load of powers (his strength is the equivalent of 5.972 sextillion metric tons, fact fans), including heat vision, which appears to be something he uses only in anger in Snyder's universe.

 

10.Super Punch

Fans of Superman punching stuff will find plenty to enjoy in this latest trailer.
We can't tell which Kryptonian fighting style he's using here. It could be Torquasm-Rao or Klurkor. Then again it could just be punching.